36 research outputs found

    MEM study of true flattening of free energy and the θ\theta term

    Full text link
    We study the sign problem in lattice field theory with a θ\theta term, which reveals as flattening phenomenon of the free energy density f(θ)f(\theta). We report the result of the MEM analysis, where such mock data are used that `true' flattening of f(θ)f(\theta) occurs. This is regarded as a simple model for studying whether the MEM could correctly detect non trivial phase structure in θ\theta space. We discuss how the MEM distinguishes fictitious and true flattening.Comment: Poster presented at Lattice2004(topology), Fermilab, June 21-26, 2004; 3 pages, 3 figure

    Lattice Field Theory with the Sign Problem and the Maximum Entropy Method

    Get PDF
    Although numerical simulation in lattice field theory is one of the most effective tools to study non-perturbative properties of field theories, it faces serious obstacles coming from the sign problem in some theories such as finite density QCD and lattice field theory with the θ\theta term. We reconsider this problem from the point of view of the maximum entropy method.Comment: This is a contribution to the Proc. of the O'Raifeartaigh Symposium on Non-Perturbative and Symmetry Methods in Field Theory (June 2006, Budapest, Hungary), published in SIGMA (Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications) at http://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA

    Maximum Entropy Method Approach to θ\theta Term

    Full text link
    In Monte Carlo simulations of lattice field theory with a θ\theta term, one confronts the complex weight problem, or the sign problem. This is circumvented by performing the Fourier transform of the topological charge distribution P(Q)P(Q). This procedure, however, causes flattening phenomenon of the free energy f(θ)f(\theta), which makes study of the phase structure unfeasible. In order to treat this problem, we apply the maximum entropy method (MEM) to a Gaussian form of P(Q)P(Q), which serves as a good example to test whether the MEM can be applied effectively to the θ\theta term. We study the case with flattening as well as that without flattening. In the latter case, the results of the MEM agree with those obtained from the direct application of the Fourier transform. For the former, the MEM gives a smoother f(θ)f(\theta) than that of the Fourier transform. Among various default models investigated, the images which yield the least error do not show flattening, although some others cannot be excluded given the uncertainty related to statistical error.Comment: PTPTEX , 25 pages with 11 figure

    Two dimensional CP^2 Model with \theta-term and Topological Charge Distributions

    Full text link
    Topological charge distributions in 2 dimensional CP^2 model with theta-term is calculated. In strong coupling regions, topological charge distribution is approximately given by Gaussian form as a function of topological charge and this behavior leads to the first order phase transition at \theta=\pi. In weak coupling regions it shows non-Gaussian distribution and the first order phase transition disappears. Free energy as a function of \theta shows "flattening" behavior at theta=theta_f<pi, when we calculate the free energy directly from topological charge distribution. Possible origin of this flattening phenomena is prensented.Comment: 17 pages,7 figure

    CPN1^{N-1} model with the theta term and maximum entropy method

    Full text link
    A θ\theta term in lattice field theory causes the sign problem in Monte Carlo simulations. This problem can be circumvented by Fourier-transforming the topological charge distribution P(Q)P(Q). This strategy, however, has a limitation, because errors of P(Q)P(Q) prevent one from calculating the partition function Z(θ){\cal Z}(\theta) properly for large volumes. This is called flattening. As an alternative approach to the Fourier method, we utilize the maximum entropy method (MEM) to calculate Z(θ){\cal Z}(\theta). We apply the MEM to Monte Carlo data of the CP3^3 model. It is found that in the non-flattening case, the result of the MEM agrees with that of the Fourier transform, while in the flattening case, the MEM gives smooth Z(θ){\cal Z}(\theta).Comment: Talk presented at Lattice2004(topology), Fermilab, June 21-26, 2004; 3 pages, 3 figure

    Application of Maximum Entropy Method to Lattice Field Theory with a Topological Term

    Full text link
    In Monte Carlo simulation, lattice field theory with a θ\theta term suffers from the sign problem. This problem can be circumvented by Fourier-transforming the topological charge distribution P(Q)P(Q). Although this strategy works well for small lattice volume, effect of errors of P(Q)P(Q) becomes serious with increasing volume and prevents one from studying the phase structure. This is called flattening. As an alternative approach, we apply the maximum entropy method (MEM) to the Gaussian P(Q)P(Q). It is found that the flattening could be much improved by use of the MEM.Comment: talk at Lattice 2003 (topology), 3 pages with 3 figure

    Sign problem and MEM in lattice field theory with the θ\theta term

    Full text link
    Lattice field theory with the θ\theta term suffers from the sign problem. The sign problem appears as flattening of the free energy. As an alternative to the conventional method, the Fourier transform method (FTM), we apply the maximum entropy method (MEM) to Monte Carlo data obtained using the CP3^3 model with the θ\theta term. For data without flattening, we obtain the most probable images of the partition function Z^(θ){\hat{\cal Z}}(\theta) with rather small errors. The results are quantitatively close to the result obtained with the FTM. Motivated by this fact, we systematically investigate flattening in terms of the MEM. Obtained images Z^(θ){\hat{\cal Z}}(\theta) are consistent with the FTM for small values of θ\theta, while the behavior of Z^(θ){\hat{\cal Z}}(\theta) depends strongly on the default model for large values of θ\theta. This behavior of Z^(θ){\hat{\cal Z}}(\theta) reflects the flattening phenomenon.Comment: PTPTEX, 20 pages with 15 figure

    String Junction Model, Cluster Hypothesis, Penta-Quark Baryon and Tetra-Quark Meson

    Full text link
    Thirty years ago we proposed string junction model of hadrons and examined structure and reaction of hadrons including exotic ones. Mass mm of exotic hadrons of light quarks is roughly given by mNJmBm \sim N_J\cdot m_B, where NJN_J is the total number of junctions and mB1m_B \sim 1 GeV is the ordinary light baryon mass. In this paper we introduce "cluster hypothesis" into the model by which mass of a complex hadron is given by the sum of masses of clusters composing it. The hypothesis guarantees the established picture that mass differences of hadrons of the same string junction structure are due to those of the constituent quarks. A candidate for penta-quark baryon Θ\Theta(1530 MeV, S=+1)S=+1) including a strange anti-quark {\sb} and that for tetra-quark meson Z+Z^+(4430 MeV) recently reported by the Bell collaboration are examined in parallel. Θ\Theta is considered to have non-strange partners, which are lighter by the mass difference Δs\Delta_s between strange and non-strange quarks. Mass of such light penta-quark baryons with NJ=3N_J=3 is expected to be about 3 GeV. Several parameters of the model are estimated such as mass of junction of mJO(10)m_J \sim O(10) MeV. While mass of light tetra-quark meson with NJ=2N_J=2 is expected to be about 2 GeV, Z+Z^+(4430 MeV) containing (u,c,{\db},{\cb}) gives a clue to determine some parameters of the model, e.g., inter-junction string energy mIJm_{IJ}.Comment: 17 pages, 4 figures, correction is made, extensively revise
    corecore